RE: [Boost-users] RE: Boost thread problem
Why not? AFAIK GSL, one of the most important open source numerical libraries uses double precision, so I do not see the point why you say double is not good enough for scientific applications. Regards, Pshemek -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Gomes Sent: 17 April 2005 04:12 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] RE: Boost thread problem Ben is right, you simply can't use double for any serious financial/scientific calculation. And indeed I hope someday an arbitrary math precision library be part of the standard C++. Look for a standard for the place where this is going to be used. If there isn't one. Use an arbitrary math precision library anyway. Take a look at mapm: http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8020/cuj0111ring/ http://www.tc.umn.edu/~ringx004/mapm-main.html There are other comercial alternatives, a quick google search produced this: http://www.boic.com/b1mnum.pdf http://www.boic.com/numintro.htm Hope this helps, Mauricio Gomes Pensar Digital phone: 55-11-4121-6287 mobile: 55-11-8319-9610 http://pensardigital.com On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) wrote:
Thanks, Ben, what should I use for representing the money amounts? A boolean :)) ?
If you're dealing with other people's money then there are regulations
that specify the required intermediate precision and rounding rules, which may vary from place to place. I believe you'll need to use fixed-point decimal fractions, perhaps implemented as integer counts of hundredths or ten-thousandths of a currency unit. I've not done this myself so I don't know the details, but I'm fairly sure that getting this wrong can put you on the wrong side of the law.
Ben. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ --------------------------------------------------------
Hi Pshemek, You are right. GSL indeed uses double and long double. Thanks for pointing that. However, consider this : (from http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8020/cuj0111ring/ Read the paragraph "Why We Need Arbitrary Precision" for more details): For example, consider the two numbers N1 = 98237307.398797975997 and N2 = 87733164872.98273499749. N1 has 20 significant digits; N2 has 22. If you assign these to C doubles, each variable will maintain only 15-16 digits of precision (assuming 64 bits). If you then multiply these numbers, the result will be precise only to the 15-16 most significant digits. You can use GSL but then when you get a GSL_ERANGE (GSL_ERANGE: Range error; used by mathematical functions when the result value is not representable because of overflow or underflow) or other exception you will need to handle this error. If you are very careful and through on this error handling my opinion is that you will probably end up writing your own version of an arbitrary precision wrapper over GSL. One interesting project might be to write a version of GSL with templates that would allow the use of an arbitrary precision math class instead of double. I might be missing something here but this is getting off topic and I think I should move to http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl for further investigation. Thanks, Mauricio Gomes Pensar Digital phone: 55-11-4121-6287 mobile: 55-11-8319-9610 http://pensardigital.com On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:11 AM, Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) wrote:
Why not?
AFAIK GSL, one of the most important open source numerical libraries uses double precision, so I do not see the point why you say double is not good enough for scientific applications.
Regards,
Pshemek
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Gomes Sent: 17 April 2005 04:12 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] RE: Boost thread problem
Ben is right, you simply can't use double for any serious financial/scientific calculation. And indeed I hope someday an arbitrary math precision library be part of the standard C++.
Look for a standard for the place where this is going to be used. If there isn't one. Use an arbitrary math precision library anyway.
Take a look at mapm: http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8020/cuj0111ring/ http://www.tc.umn.edu/~ringx004/mapm-main.html
There are other comercial alternatives, a quick google search produced this: http://www.boic.com/b1mnum.pdf http://www.boic.com/numintro.htm
Hope this helps, Mauricio Gomes Pensar Digital phone: 55-11-4121-6287 mobile: 55-11-8319-9610 http://pensardigital.com
On Apr 15, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London) wrote:
Thanks, Ben, what should I use for representing the money amounts? A boolean :)) ?
If you're dealing with other people's money then there are regulations
that specify the required intermediate precision and rounding rules, which may vary from place to place. I believe you'll need to use fixed-point decimal fractions, perhaps implemented as integer counts of hundredths or ten-thousandths of a currency unit. I've not done this myself so I don't know the details, but I'm fairly sure that getting this wrong can put you on the wrong side of the law.
Ben. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users --------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ --------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (2)
-
Mauricio Gomes -
Sliwa, Przemyslaw (London)