Cheers Doug, I was thinking more of a, "hey, what do you think to this lads" than an outright "you should be using Boost heathens!" :) Sound advice nontheless mate, I'll keep you posted. Gaz -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Doug Gregor Sent: 17 November 2004 20:25 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots On Nov 17, 2004, at 11:34 AM, Foster, Gareth wrote:

Thanks for the reply Doug, do you mind at all if I forward this to the GTKmm mailing list?

Go ahead.

I would like to ask them what they think of your implementation. I hope to use GTKmm (which uses libsigc++ of course), and I think boost is great, so I'd be interested to see if maybe the GTKmm devs could be using boost more etc. I'm sure you get the idea, main thing is, I don't want it to look like I am trying to start a slaging match (hence me asking first) :)

I would suggest learning quite a bit about both libsigc++ and Boost.Signals before you try to suggest to anyone that they make such a switch, because it will surely require a significant amount of effort and may change the semantics of GTKmm considerably. Doug _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users