1.45 download sourceforge corrupt
hello. has anyone downloaded 1.45 archives from sourceforge recently. I've downloaded the 4 formats and all of them appear corrupt to 7zip and winrar on windows I've tried 2 different mirrors rds,
"Hicham Mouline" <hicham@mouline.org> writes:
hello. has anyone downloaded 1.45 archives from sourceforge recently. I've downloaded the 4 formats and all of them appear corrupt to 7zip and winrar on windows
I got it on the second go 'round from the main sourceforge mirror. The first time just never downloaded at all, then it worked the second time. Weird.
Hi, It might be worthwhile providing MD5 numbers for some downloadable files? You can generate MD5s on Linux on the command line with the md5sum command or under windows with the "HashTab" application (http://beeblebrox.org/). HTH, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org/
Ian Bruntlett <ian.bruntlett <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi,It might be worthwhile providing MD5 numbers for some downloadable
files?You can generate MD5s on Linux on the command line with the md5sum command or under windows with the "HashTab" application (http://beeblebrox.org/). Yep, we should be doing this. I'll add it to the release procedure. FWIW, here are the MD5 sums for 1.45.0: 3aa6b9e13268965680c0adf41734f718 *boost_1_45_0.7z d405c606354789d0426bc07bea617e58 *boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2 739792c98fafb95e7a6b5da23a30062c *boost_1_45_0.tar.gz 4379c7b92bf1ec74cd26908f60920cd1 *boost_1_45_0.zip Thanks for the suggestion, --Beman
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Beman Dawes Sent: 18 December 2010 22:37 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] 1.45 download sourceforge corrupt
Ian Bruntlett <ian.bruntlett <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi,It might be worthwhile providing MD5 numbers for some downloadable
files?You can generate MD5s on Linux on the command line with the md5sum command or under windows with the "HashTab" application (http://beeblebrox.org/).
Yep, we should be doing this. I'll add it to the release procedure.
FWIW, here are the MD5 sums for 1.45.0:
3aa6b9e13268965680c0adf41734f718 *boost_1_45_0.7z d405c606354789d0426bc07bea617e58 *boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2 739792c98fafb95e7a6b5da23a30062c *boost_1_45_0.tar.gz 4379c7b92bf1ec74cd26908f60920cd1 *boost_1_45_0.zip
Thanks for the suggestion,
--Beman
_______________________________________________
I finally found the reason: google chrome 32bit on winxp64 downloads the archive wrong for some reason. v6.0.472 It could be: 1. some user setting is wrong. 2. that version has a bug 3. 32bit chrome on win64 has problems 4. all chrome versions have a problem with boost or sourceforge:-) I've tried with IE32bit and it worked Sorry about the hassle, I'll pursue with google,
On 12/18/2010 9:05 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
hello. has anyone downloaded 1.45 archives from sourceforge recently. I've downloaded the 4 formats and all of them appear corrupt to 7zip and winrar on windows
I've tried 2 different mirrors
Just asked Beman to look into this. He downloaded the .7z file from sourceforge. For him, 7zip had no trouble unpacking it. Thoughts? -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Eric Niebler Sent: 18 December 2010 15:51 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] 1.45 download sourceforge corrupt
On 12/18/2010 9:05 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
hello. has anyone downloaded 1.45 archives from sourceforge recently. I've downloaded the 4 formats and all of them appear corrupt to 7zip and winrar on windows
I've tried 2 different mirrors
Just asked Beman to look into this. He downloaded the .7z file from sourceforge. For him, 7zip had no trouble unpacking it. Thoughts?
-- Eric Niebler
7zip and winrar both say there are over 30000 files broken. I can browse the files however. Note I have a win64 xp box. Yesterday, I managed to unzip it with winrar successfully on a win32 box. Could that be the reason?
participants (1)
-
Beman Dawes -
Bill O'Connor -
Eric Niebler -
Hicham Mouline -
Ian Bruntlett