On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

On 13/05/2016 15:07, Rene Rivera wrote:

...

Release 1.61.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available.

For details, including download links, see

...

http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.61.0

You can also download directly from SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.61.0/

You can optionally verify integrity of the source downloads using the attached signed checksums file.

First, verify your downloads have the right checksums, by putting the file alongside the downloads, and running:

$ sha256sum -c boost_1_61_0.sums.asc

This should produce "OK" message for each source archive you have available.

This step fails, in the boost_1_61_0.sums.asc file the file names have boost_1_61.0.* instead of boost_1_61_0.* (note the . replacing an _ ). Manually verifying the checksums

Second, verify that the checksums file itself was not modified:

$ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv DA472E8659753BA4 $ gpg --verify boost_1_61_0.sums.asc

If everything is good, this should say "Good Signature" and also report these key fingerprints:

Primary key fingerprint: C5F0 F367 AA66 616F B839 806E DA47 2E86 5975 3BA4 Subkey fingerprint: 7805 7A0D 045A 2DC5 5453 BD81 0F1A 3ECD 4EAC 2316

You might want to trust they key for future use if fingerprints match.

I get a good verification on the file. Tom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

...

On 17/05/2016 13:16, Vladimir Prus wrote:

...

On 13/05/2016 15:07, Rene Rivera wrote: Release 1.61.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available.

For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.61.0

You can also download directly from SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.61.0/

You can optionally verify integrity of the source downloads using the attached signed checksums file.

Tom has pointed a typo in file names in the file. Correct one is now attached, and instructions for validating are the same:

I now get good hashes and a good signature verification. I'm signing this email with my private key "Thomas Kent " for the record. Tom Original Attachment: - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 a547bd06c2fd9a71ba1d169d9cf0339da7ebf4753849a8f7d6fdb8feee99b640 boost_1_61_0.tar.bz2 a77c7cc660ec02704c6884fbb20c552d52d60a18f26573c9cee0788bf00ed7e6 boost_1_61_0.tar.gz fa1c34862b7ba8674ed6e064a14667a11830c6252f702d9458451834b74f7815 boost_1_61_0.7z 02d420e6908016d4ac74dfc712eec7d9616a7fc0da78b0a1b5b937536b2e01e8 boost_1_61_0.zip - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXPBG3AAoJEA8aPs1OrCMWL1QQAJCsQbr4rxpQMDssW5O0Fupg aw8Us0CnfPLSPW5gMdQoIQxu/n1SNobn4Vg1/hyTfweufqFwHFRxJnHiWtlbI/GB q1TueLPCxcJUi6lT7ZOVcpKb6AS6vOnSJRODQ0zk62phKBmLDUxiBI46FlCkzHbz uWVG+wttzk2Skeb3400xWEMtM0fgX3oJenh5Ye//oD7biJC0aIVPrnkauQ2Nze0l 2nG8e7w7ZzlXEx0Ei8KHiyBsFMj0/O5JIJKbxWorBAeELSgWun0YqB9EnrbADGDp XCEUUg1FB2llTmpG3a/dyv8fMlAS/ENka7e4aGuIHAlyfmTKGx+9Zd813XLiSjvw CHCyp+b7v0dGn2RFrVhgl9qRyFKgcvYjhhsA42iO0eFt7rgkoXV72qQzjSClzjkS jJrcj8dxJkZVMJ9tWKCmzGoPYRj4z8Nt8dw7HDqFGb7/2Rw6FZ18N9SsqHD+y9G3 TZhPPYQJVqckM9qo0CFzYwZpjiBgLhhQI6iEUh8UB8xXB09cJfgHGvyszXsvR+3l xQvKq19BYWHlPoi4Ie+YUzxF81Pgj98mbnwXLcgUoLBZWueXGfFdf+nBvyDoQyli LbHEpt0cGwWyfk+HXt+Qa5dmSRMr7zZpmWseBr9/6J1gCoNxAEOqHZ1hCrpFIHWt pM+LHXktogy3CpBV2IXH =6T/2 - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXPIMxAAoJEO5CwwL7YZSoqjQQAME+iTB9MhE3Jz2AAl7+tohB +v8U25f1C2X6qbVTKCynG+FzdfthIOwdLeReIcY8fUD7O30LqhYpfjPgDJvRqvDT pjU/jxD4ORLn9aEtNGcEX+EtSuO9dV2eZP3cDcyNnTRUu26O6LkJN2wRb2BFa1kN coVuhNSD7I8BBpiNgWo/J09Ajv3GRags8y6WHjC6IUD5isGUGMGD7udhjD6qcX/q hiyTfdzkqMo5lDmGj20JCsuXg1Iqku5JKydeDH4vunpZokbDmtSja992kzMSRFGK CemHapPcml5ei8ubvEnROYLPcIpcrL9zpO6vTpKRQs5dzfJDkeiCeS9Zgvm/fb7h G4yoUD08ccU0HHwRVCNdpHXPRgSSh3JJp94XuWO/sFgNg0q+5pGeGoqnveBaroqu zAgdcteBmw+YoU39bWt+kPu5zVbVygHZNXpC0BOKc8+IP86wwOvEHDEUm1o5UQma QPWQrZuoMcGNE9SZn1K1Zg+oJ6KG5Ykp5SOhhb3SrV7Oqb3SN3lg9lbEyGBHa/lY SUSLdMlkcEtUITRu6KcYJAVw9Pbq2O8AZWYPZSjToZxpEFv4+53VOSr3mkpFQxMc dzral/n0Yyw+XsqIke1kdzWpbCGrPAy0Pm5BGB7Fsi9iq1JbVjVi47ZIk4L16L0H gmgII1jsJy8+R3XXpGRZ =x/tu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Le 18/05/16 à 10:07, Daniel James a écrit :

On 17 May 2016 at 21:42, Raffi Enficiaud wrote:

...

Thanks! The boost.test documentation has the banner "click here to view the latest version on this page" on the top: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_61_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html

Sorry for the late mention, I thought it was because 1.61 was not released yet. Anything I did wrong? Anything I can do?

Sorry about that, it was a bug. It should be fixed now, you might have to shift-refresh to see the fixed page.

Works, thanks!