...

my_button.on_click = bind( (_1 ->* &A::GetController).DoSomething (), this );

I think what you want is something like bind( &Controller::DoSomething, bind( &A::GetController, _1 ) );

...

I think what you want is something like bind( &Controller::DoSomething,           bind( &A::GetController, _1 ) );

That didn't work when I tried earlier, either because bind() produces a function instead of a pointer to a Controller or because GetController returns a reference instead of a pointer.

When binding member pointers, LL accepts either pointers or references as the object argument, and the above should thus work. This example works for me: #include "boost/lambda/bind.hpp" #include "boost/lambda/lambda.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost; using namespace boost::lambda; class Controller { public: void DoSomething() { std::cout << "Hello World!"; }; }; class View { Controller& contr; public: View(Controller& c) : contr(c) {}; Controller& GetController() { return contr; } }; int main () { Controller c; View v(c); bind(&Controller::DoSomething, bind(&View::GetController, _1))(v); }; /Jaakko

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT

Info: http://www.boost.org Wiki: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

-- -- -- Jaakko Järvi email: jajarvi@cs.indiana.edu -- Post Doctoral Fellow phone: +1 (812) 855-3608 -- Pervasive Technology Labs fax: +1 (812) 855-4829 -- Indiana University, Bloomington

Oh, that works, thanks! To clarify though, for a member function, bind can be passed either an object pointer, an object reference, a function that returns an object pointer (the result of another bind), or a function that returns an object reference?

Yes, here are some of the cases: #include "boost/lambda/bind.hpp" #include "boost/lambda/lambda.hpp" #include <iostream> using namespace boost; using namespace boost::lambda; class Controller { public: void DoSomething() { std::cout << "Hello World!"; }; }; class View { Controller& contr; public: View(Controller& c) : contr(c) {}; Controller& GetController() { return contr; } Controller* GetControllerPtr() { return &contr; } }; int main () { Controller c; View v(c); View* vp = &v; bind(&Controller::DoSomething, bind(&View::GetController, _1))(v); bind(&Controller::DoSomething, bind(&View::GetController, _1))(vp); bind(&Controller::DoSomething, bind(&View::GetControllerPtr, _1))(vp); }; // ------------------------ Cheers, Jaakko

I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do, but here's some explanation on bind and ->*

First, The dot operator cannot be overloaded, so you do this:

(_1 ->* &A::GetController).DoSomething

// DoSomething is not defined for (_1 ->* &A::GetController)

The semantics of ->* in general is rather tricky, and the Lambda Library mimics that:

Here's a snippet of the LL docs:

For a built-in call like this, the result is kind of a delayed member function call. Such an expression must be followed by a function argument list, with which the delayed member function call is

Yeah, I'm not sure why I used _1 in the example, but ultimately my goal is to delay the call to the DoSomething method of Controller. something like this would feel kind of natural: boost::function0 delayed_controller = (this ->* &View::GetController); bind(_1 ->* &Controller::DoSomething, delayed_controller ); but delayed_controller is a function instead of a Controller pointer and its return type isn't a Controller pointer either, it's a Controller reference. --- In Boost-Users@y..., Jaakko Jarvi wrote: performed.

For example:

struct B { int foo(int); }; B* b = new B(); ... (b ->* &B::foo) // returns a delayed call to b->foo // a function argument list must follow (b ->* &B::foo)(1) // ok, calls b->foo(1)

(_1 ->* &B::foo)(b); // returns a delayed call to b->foo, // no effect as such (_1 ->* &B::foo)(b)(1); // calls b->foo(1)

The LL can figure out the return type when binding a pointer to member function so you do no have to say bind, just bind is enugh.

If you just try to bind a member function call, leaving the object open, you would write:

bind(&View::GetController, _1);

Could be called as:

View w; bind(&View::GetController, _1)(v);

Cheers, Jaakko

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, khuroth wrote:

...

whoops, sorry about the typos.  any A:: here is really View::

--- In Boost-Users@y..., "khuroth" wrote:

...

I have a View class that has some widgets, and a Controller class that controls the view, so the View class has a GetController() member function that returns a reference to its controller. When the View's constructor is called, GetController() would return a bad ref, but it would return a valid reference by the time a button is clicked... so what I'm trying to do is, inside the View constructor:

my_button.on_click = bind( (_1 ->* &A::GetController).DoSomething (), this );

but that obviously doesn't work... I'm even having trouble just saving the first part:

my_button.on_click = bind(_1 ->* &A::GetController, this);

also doesn't work... I tried defining the on_click member of the button as a boost::function<void> or a boost::function0<void> in the first example, and a boost::function or boost::function0 in the second snip... I get immense compiler errors, so I'm not sure where I messed up.

What am I doing wrong?

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT [ericsson_300x250.jpg] Info: http://www.boost.org Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi- bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@y...

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

-- -- -- Jaakko Järvi email: jajarvi@c... -- Post Doctoral Fellow phone: +1 (812) 855-3608 -- Pervasive Technology Labs fax: +1 (812) 855-4829 -- Indiana University, Bloomington