Hi, The 1.34.0 release candidate is now available from http:// www.boost.org/release/ please give it a try and report any problems to the developer list or directly to me. The tentative release date is May 11. Thanks Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org
Hi, I had earlier reported an issue in the built librariy names on win32 using MSVC. I am using VS.net to build boost. The header file (doing an implicit link calling #pragma "link") tries to link to a file with "vc71" but the file has "vc". It is trivial to fix this by editing the "config/auto_link.h" but the proble is in the build generating the wrong file names (wrong: based on the 1_33_1 version of boost and 1_32 version too). IMHO, build on win32 using VS.net needs to get fixed before a final release or each user will start modifying either the header to look for "vc" or modify the build to generate "vc71" or do a manual renaming of files to "vc71" (which I have done). with best regards, dhruva On 5/9/07, Thomas Witt <witt@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
The 1.34.0 release candidate is now available from http:// www.boost.org/release/ please give it a try and report any problems to the developer list or directly to me.
The tentative release date is May 11.
Thanks
Thomas
-- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!
dhruva wrote:
Hi, I had earlier reported an issue in the built librariy names on win32 using MSVC. I am using VS.net to build boost. The header file (doing an implicit link calling #pragma "link") tries to link to a file with "vc71" but the file has "vc". It is trivial to fix this by editing the "config/auto_link.h" but the proble is in the build generating the wrong file names (wrong: based on the 1_33_1 version of boost and 1_32 version too).
IMHO, build on win32 using VS.net needs to get fixed before a final release or each user will start modifying either the header to look for "vc" or modify the build to generate "vc71" or do a manual renaming of files to "vc71" (which I have done).
with best regards, dhruva
On 5/9/07, Thomas Witt <witt@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
The 1.34.0 release candidate is now available from http:// www.boost.org/release/ please give it a try and report any problems to the developer list or directly to me.
The tentative release date is May 11.
Thanks
Thomas
-- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Hi, try: --toolset=msvc-7.1 when building the libs. Then the library names are -vc71- instead of -vc-. -- Regards, dave
Hi, On 5/9/07, David Klein <dave_chp@gmx.de> wrote:
try: --toolset=msvc-7.1 when building the libs. Then the library names are -vc71- instead of -vc-.
Thanks, it is building and I am seeing the proper names! with best regards, dhruva -- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!
Hey, to compile boost with STLport 5.*, should I modify a file (user-config.jam, iirc), or can I set it with an option ? last time I tried, Vladimir Prus told me to modify that file. Vincent Torri
dhruva wrote:
Hi, I had earlier reported an issue in the built librariy names on win32 using MSVC. I am using VS.net to build boost. The header file (doing an implicit link calling #pragma "link") tries to link to a file with "vc71" but the file has "vc". It is trivial to fix this by editing the "config/auto_link.h" but the proble is in the build generating the wrong file names (wrong: based on the 1_33_1 version of boost and 1_32 version too).
IMHO, build on win32 using VS.net needs to get fixed before a final release or each user will start modifying either the header to look for "vc" or modify the build to generate "vc71" or do a manual renaming of files to "vc71" (which I have done).
Your earlier post was replied to, and you was suggested to use --toolset=msvc-7.1 Did that work? - Volodya
This issue with the toolset for building msvc is documented here: http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started.html#Tools. Notice under the msvc option it refers you to the msvc-7.1 etc.. toolsets. I don't know how difficult it would be to change the toolset code to do an autodetect as it does for gcc.
Hi I wonder is it compulsory to construct object when perform de-serialization. In my appliation, I just wanna update the memeber attribute from deserialization. Best regards Barr Ng _________________________________________________________________ Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE! http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
Ng Pan wrote:
Hi
I wonder is it compulsory to construct object when perform de-serialization. In my appliation, I just wanna update the memeber attribute from deserialization.
Best regards Barr Ng
_________________________________________________________________ Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE! http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
<some archive type> ar; X* x; ar & x; // constructs the object when deserializing ar & *x; // does what you want -- Johan Råde
I got it, thank you very much Barr Ng
From: Johan Råde <rade@maths.lth.se> Reply-To: boost-users@lists.boost.org To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization, is it compulsory to construct object when perform de-serial Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 12:59:35 +0200
Ng Pan wrote:
Hi
I wonder is it compulsory to construct object when perform de-serialization. In my appliation, I just wanna update the memeber attribute from deserialization.
Best regards Barr Ng
_________________________________________________________________ Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE! http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
<some archive type> ar; X* x;
ar & x; // constructs the object when deserializing ar & *x; // does what you want
-- Johan Råde
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_________________________________________________________________ Get 10Mb extra storage for MSN Hotmail. Subscribe Now! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-hk
No Some objects like collections are re-constructed. But generally no construction is done. Robert Ramey Ng Pan wrote:
Hi
I wonder is it compulsory to construct object when perform de-serialization. In my appliation, I just wanna update the memeber attribute from deserialization.
Best regards Barr Ng
_________________________________________________________________ Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE! http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
participants (1)
-
David Klein -
dhruva -
James Sharpe -
Johan Råde -
Ng Pan -
Robert Ramey -
Thomas Witt -
Vincent Torri -
Vladimir Prus