Boost.Test BOOST_TEST/BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE message arg problems
Hello Boost Users,
for my project I'm testing using BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE and data driven
test sets (BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE). The goal is to check the proper
working of a parser by checking success as such and compare the result
with a "expected" data (string) vector. In case of parse error, I want
to write the captured cout/cerr by boost.test into a file. In case of
compare error the parsed result also shall be written to a file. The
fragments show the concept/current state:
namespace x3_test { // aka utils ....
/* [Detect if boost test case failed](
*
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18466857/detect-if-boost-test-case-faile...)
*/
bool current_test_passing()
{
using namespace boost::unit_test;
auto const id = framework::current_test_case().p_id;
auto const test_results = results_collector.results(id);
return test_results.passed();
}
std::string report_diagnostic(fs::path const& test_case_name,
std::string const& input, std::string const& result)
{
...
if(!x3_test::current_test_passing()) { // only write in case of
failed test
test_case_result_writer result_writer(test_case_name);
result_writer.write(result);
}
return ss.str();
}
} // x3_test
...
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(....
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( declaration,
dataset.input()
^ dataset.expect()
^ dataset.test_case_name(),
code, expect_AST, test_case_name)
{
using attribute_type = ast::declaration;
auto const parser = parser::declaration;
x3_test::testing_parser
Le 20/05/2018 à 19:42, Olaf Peter via Boost-users a écrit :
Hello Boost Users,
for my project I'm testing using BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE and data driven test sets (BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE). The goal is to check the proper working of a parser by checking success as such and compare the result with a "expected" data (string) vector. In case of parse error, I want to write the captured cout/cerr by boost.test into a file. In case of compare error the parsed result also shall be written to a file. The fragments show the concept/current state:
namespace x3_test { // aka utils ....
/* [Detect if boost test case failed]( * https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18466857/detect-if-boost-test-case-faile...) */ bool current_test_passing() { using namespace boost::unit_test; auto const id = framework::current_test_case().p_id; auto const test_results = results_collector.results(id); return test_results.passed(); }
std::string report_diagnostic(fs::path const& test_case_name, std::string const& input, std::string const& result) { ... if(!x3_test::current_test_passing()) { // only write in case of failed test test_case_result_writer result_writer(test_case_name); result_writer.write(result); } return ss.str(); }
} // x3_test
...
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(....
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( declaration, dataset.input() ^ dataset.expect() ^ dataset.test_case_name(), code, expect_AST, test_case_name) { using attribute_type = ast::declaration; auto const parser = parser::declaration;
x3_test::testing_parser
parse; auto [parse_ok, parsed_AST] = parse(code, parser); BOOST_TEST(parse_ok); BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE(parse_ok, x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) );
BOOST_TEST(parsed_AST == expect_AST, btt::per_element()); BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE(x3_test::current_test_passing(), x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) ); }
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
After some testing, the error count is twice the real (obviously here) but it's all above a work arround.
It seems, that BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE evaluates always the message predicate (shown by using --log_level=all) nevertheless the test case successed or failed. If failed it is streamed to the console.
That sounds odd to me. Would it be possible to check if the messages get evaluated in case you do not pass --log_level=all ? Otherwise, if you be kind of you if you file a bug.
My first thoughs where that the message is called only in case of test failure which isn't true.
The problem is now, that my report_diagnostic function write the test output (parsed_AST) to a special dir/file for later evaluating etc. The intuitive way would be:
std::string report_diagnostic(fs::path const& test_case_name, std::string const& input, std::string const& result) { ... test_case_result_writer result_writer(test_case_name); result_writer.write(result);
return ss.str(); }
BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE(parse_ok, // call diagnostic only in failure case and write then x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) ); BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE((parsed_AST == expect_AST, btt::per_element()), // call diagnostic only in failure case and write then x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) );
Hence not depending on current_test_passing() any more.
How to get this?
What about : 1- using test-case fixtures for writing things at the end of the test 2- registering an observer for getting the failure signal? The observer is (kind of) described here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra... You may install and remove it globally by using a global fixture: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_refe... Once registered, it will capture the events that you want, especially the failure cases. From the observer, you can get the current test cases with this https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
Further, how can I get the captured std::cerr in case of '!parse_ok' inside report_diagnostic?
Currently you have to do it manually. See this https://stackoverflow.com/a/5419388/1617295 This can again go to a fixture of your own. There is a feature request on the backlog though: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12452 Best, Raffi
Hello Raffi, thank you for 'reloading' the topic. The next 14 days I'm on vacation; after this I will check your suggestions in detail and reduce the problem to minimal example if required. Thank you, Olaf
Hello Raffi,
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(....
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( declaration, dataset.input() ^ dataset.expect() ^ dataset.test_case_name(), code, expect_AST, test_case_name) { using attribute_type = ast::declaration; auto const parser = parser::declaration;
x3_test::testing_parser
parse; auto [parse_ok, parsed_AST] = parse(code, parser); BOOST_TEST(parse_ok); BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE(parse_ok, x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) );
BOOST_TEST(parsed_AST == expect_AST, btt::per_element()); BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE(x3_test::current_test_passing(), x3_test::report_diagnostic(test_case_name, code, parsed_AST) ); }
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
After some testing, the error count is twice the real (obviously here) but it's all above a work arround.
It seems, that BOOST_REQUIRE_MESSAGE evaluates always the message predicate (shown by using --log_level=all) nevertheless the test case successed or failed. If failed it is streamed to the console.
That sounds odd to me. Would it be possible to check if the messages get evaluated in case you do not pass --log_level=all ?
I reduced it and found the original problem. Checking parse_ok twice results into two messages, this explain what I faced (and misinterpreted in the last mail). The reason for introducing this was the intention of: - check on parse_ok success - if not, generate a diagnostic message - all further checks can be canceled - compare the result per_element with reference/gold data - if failed, generate a diagnostic message - note, report_diagnostic saves the parsed_AST for later inspection The problem may rise due to my limited understanding about the macros arround.
What about :
1- using test-case fixtures for writing things at the end of the test 2- registering an observer for getting the failure signal?
The observer is (kind of) described here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
You may install and remove it globally by using a global fixture:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_refe...
Once registered, it will capture the events that you want, especially the failure cases.
From the observer, you can get the current test cases with this
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
I will check/evaluate it next time, it simplifies diagnostic since the parsed_AST can be written by the observer Thank you, Olaf
How to get this?
What about :
1- using test-case fixtures for writing things at the end of the test 2- registering an observer for getting the failure signal?
The observer is (kind of) described here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
You may install and remove it globally by using a global fixture:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_refe...
Once registered, it will capture the events that you want, especially the failure cases.
From the observer, you can get the current test cases with this
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready: class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? }; test_observer observer; public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture(); public: void setup(); void teardown(); }; and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort? BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name); BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok); BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element()); ??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); } Thanks, Olaf
On 23.07.18 19:28, Olaf Peter via Boost-users wrote:
How to get this?
What about :
1- using test-case fixtures for writing things at the end of the test 2- registering an observer for getting the failure signal?
The observer is (kind of) described here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
You may install and remove it globally by using a global fixture:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_refe...
Once registered, it will capture the events that you want, especially the failure cases.
From the observer, you can get the current test cases with this
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready:
class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? };
test_observer observer;
public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture();
public: void setup(); void teardown(); };
and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort?
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name);
BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok);
BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element());
??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); }
Thanks, Olaf
Sorry for the late answer, In the teardown, you may check if the current test had failures. You can do so by accessing the global singleton "results_collector". If "tc" is the current test case (that you can get with "current_test_case"): test_results const& tr = results_collector.results( tc.p_id ); will give you the result. If the fixture should be applied to each of the test case inside your suite, you can install it like this: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or... Accessing via the test result will let you check if this is a failure or an abort: the BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE (BOOST_REQUIRE is deprecated) will fire an abort if I remember well. Using this way to install the fixture will also let you access the instance of the fixture directly (see examples in the documentation). Since you solved your issue with the double messages, I would just use the appropriate fixture and forget about the observer. Raffi PS: I am not sure that the teardown is called for data test case (something I forgot to check). You may do that in the dtor of your fixture.
On 23.07.18 19:28, Olaf Peter via Boost-users wrote:
How to get this?
What about :
1- using test-case fixtures for writing things at the end of the test 2- registering an observer for getting the failure signal?
The observer is (kind of) described here: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
You may install and remove it globally by using a global fixture:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/utf_refe...
Once registered, it will capture the events that you want, especially the failure cases.
From the observer, you can get the current test cases with this
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/boost/unit_test/fra...
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready:
class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? };
test_observer observer;
public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture();
public: void setup(); void teardown(); };
and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort?
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name);
BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok);
BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element());
??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); }
Thanks, Olaf
Sorry for the late answer,
In the teardown, you may check if the current test had failures. You can do so by accessing the global singleton "results_collector". If "tc" is the current test case (that you can get with "current_test_case"):
test_results const& tr = results_collector.results( tc.p_id );
will give you the result.
If the fixture should be applied to each of the test case inside your suite, you can install it like this:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or...
Accessing via the test result will let you check if this is a failure or an abort: the BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE (BOOST_REQUIRE is deprecated) will fire an abort if I remember well. Using this way to install the fixture will also let you access the instance of the fixture directly (see examples in the documentation).
Since you solved your issue with the double messages, I would just use the appropriate fixture and forget about the observer.
Raffi
PS: I am not sure that the teardown is called for data test case (something I forgot to check). You may do that in the dtor of your fixture.
Am 08.08.2018 um 13:22 schrieb Raffi Enficiaud via Boost-users: thanks for your answer - I will implement and check it next. Regards, Olaf
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready:
class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? };
test_observer observer;
public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture();
public: void setup(); void teardown(); };
and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort?
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name);
BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok);
BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element());
??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); }
Thanks, Olaf
Sorry for the late answer,
In the teardown, you may check if the current test had failures. You can do so by accessing the global singleton "results_collector". If "tc" is the current test case (that you can get with "current_test_case"):
test_results const& tr = results_collector.results( tc.p_id );
will give you the result.
If the fixture should be applied to each of the test case inside your suite, you can install it like this:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or...
Accessing via the test result will let you check if this is a failure or an abort: the BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE (BOOST_REQUIRE is deprecated) will fire an abort if I remember well. Using this way to install the fixture will also let you access the instance of the fixture directly (see examples in the documentation).
Since my global testobserver works for all events which may interested
even in the future (e.g exceptions), I have problems to apply them in my
use case.
I've added a member function to my testobserer fixture
void test_obserer_fixture::failure_diagnostic(std::string const&, ...)
which I can activate on failed tests using the events I've got from
utf::observer::assertion_result()
Now, in file test_main.cpp I have:
-----------------------------------------
#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE "Test Suite"
#include
Am 18.08.2018 um 20:38 schrieb Olaf Peter via Boost-users:
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready:
class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? };
test_observer observer;
public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture();
public: void setup(); void teardown(); };
and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort?
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name);
BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok);
BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element());
??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); }
Thanks, Olaf
Sorry for the late answer,
In the teardown, you may check if the current test had failures. You can do so by accessing the global singleton "results_collector". If "tc" is the current test case (that you can get with "current_test_case"):
test_results const& tr = results_collector.results( tc.p_id );
will give you the result.
If the fixture should be applied to each of the test case inside your suite, you can install it like this:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or...
Accessing via the test result will let you check if this is a failure or an abort: the BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE (BOOST_REQUIRE is deprecated) will fire an abort if I remember well. Using this way to install the fixture will also let you access the instance of the fixture directly (see examples in the documentation).
Since my global testobserver works for all events which may interested even in the future (e.g exceptions), I have problems to apply them in my use case.
I've added a member function to my testobserer fixture
void test_obserer_fixture::failure_diagnostic(std::string const&, ...) which I can activate on failed tests using the events I've got from utf::observer::assertion_result()
Now, in file test_main.cpp I have: ----------------------------------------- #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE "Test Suite" #include
#include using test_observer_fixture = testsuite::test_observer_fixture; BOOST_TEST_GLOBAL_FIXTURE(test_observer_fixture); -----------------------------------------
and in (I have several) concrete test case file: ------------------------------------------ #include
#include #include ... BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE( my_testsuite ) BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( failure_test,... ..., input, expected, test_case_name) { ... } -------------------------------------------
and I can see/log: # assertion failed: failure_test/test_case/_0
But how to access the global fixture now?
I've changed the test case to: ------------------------------------------ ... BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F(test_observer_fixture, failure_test, ..., input, expected, test_case_name) { ... failure_diagnostic(...); } -------------------------------------------
Boost.Test ships a BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F() macro for this case, which is a 'local' fixture, each time constructed and destroyed which is expensive - so I like the idea of a global fixture to save to filesystem. Even I've installed it as global one too the events are doubled... but I can see that the test observer shows the test status followed by the call to failure_diagnostic - so the concept works.
To reduce it: How can I access a member function of global fixture on a compilation unit layout shown above.
even the use of BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE( my_testsuite, test_observer_fixture ) seems to create/destroy the fixture for each test case.
On 18.08.18 20:51, Olaf Peter via Boost-users wrote:
Am 18.08.2018 um 20:38 schrieb Olaf Peter via Boost-users:
OK, my test_observer_fixture with overloads is ready:
class test_observer_fixture { struct test_observer : public utf::test_observer { virtual void test_unit_aborted(utf::test_unit const& tu) override; virtual void assertion_result(utf::assertion_result result) override; // are the others required for my use case? };
test_observer observer;
public: test_observer_fixture(); ~test_observer_fixture();
public: void setup(); void teardown(); };
and get called by my BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE. What is the prefered way to use this Fixture to save the test result in case of failure/abort?
BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( wave, utf_data::make_delayedtestsuite::dataset_loader( "test_case/wave" ), input, expected, orig_file_name) { ... auto [parse_ok, parse_result] = parse(input, parser, test_case_name);
BOOST_REQUIRE(parse_ok);
BOOST_TEST(parse_result == expected, btt::per_element());
??? my_diagnostic_saving .... (orig_file_name, input, parse_result); ); }
Thanks, Olaf
Sorry for the late answer,
In the teardown, you may check if the current test had failures. You can do so by accessing the global singleton "results_collector". If "tc" is the current test case (that you can get with "current_test_case"):
test_results const& tr = results_collector.results( tc.p_id );
will give you the result.
If the fixture should be applied to each of the test case inside your suite, you can install it like this:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_67_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or...
Accessing via the test result will let you check if this is a failure or an abort: the BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE (BOOST_REQUIRE is deprecated) will fire an abort if I remember well. Using this way to install the fixture will also let you access the instance of the fixture directly (see examples in the documentation).
Since my global testobserver works for all events which may interested even in the future (e.g exceptions), I have problems to apply them in my use case.
I've added a member function to my testobserer fixture
void test_obserer_fixture::failure_diagnostic(std::string const&, ...) which I can activate on failed tests using the events I've got from utf::observer::assertion_result()
Now, in file test_main.cpp I have: ----------------------------------------- #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE "Test Suite" #include
#include using test_observer_fixture = testsuite::test_observer_fixture; BOOST_TEST_GLOBAL_FIXTURE(test_observer_fixture); -----------------------------------------
and in (I have several) concrete test case file: ------------------------------------------ #include
#include #include ... BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE( my_testsuite ) BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( failure_test,... ..., input, expected, test_case_name) { ... } -------------------------------------------
and I can see/log: # assertion failed: failure_test/test_case/_0
But how to access the global fixture now?
I've changed the test case to: ------------------------------------------ ... BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F(test_observer_fixture, failure_test, ..., input, expected, test_case_name) { ... failure_diagnostic(...); } -------------------------------------------
Boost.Test ships a BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F() macro for this case, which is a 'local' fixture, each time constructed and destroyed which is expensive - so I like the idea of a global fixture to save to filesystem. Even I've installed it as global one too the events are doubled... but I can see that the test observer shows the test status followed by the call to failure_diagnostic - so the concept works.
To reduce it: How can I access a member function of global fixture on a compilation unit layout shown above.
even the use of
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE( my_testsuite, test_observer_fixture )
seems to create/destroy the fixture for each test case.
This one: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_68_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or... does it once per test suite. However it is isolated from the test case. The fact that a test case body can access the fixture is not a very good pattern and has several caveats (although very convenient). For instance, as you can observe, global fixtures and test case/suite fixtures do not have the same isolation. If you want to access the global fixture, you have to expose your fixture globally, provide some static member function that return a pointer to a singleton. The test framework itself will not create more than one instance. But I am a bit lost in what you are doing, and to me this does not go to the right direction. If the test module is very complicated to maintain, it reduces the chances to be useful, steady and stable on the long run. When I look back, I can see one of the comment in the code that says: // call diagnostic only in failure case and write then This means to me that a fixture should be executed for each test case. The purpose of the fixture would be to write the diagnostic in case of a failure. Does this only work for you? Best, Raffi
Boost.Test ships a BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F() macro for this case, which is a 'local' fixture, each time constructed and destroyed which is expensive - so I like the idea of a global fixture to save to filesystem. Even I've installed it as global one too the events are doubled... but I can see that the test observer shows the test status followed by the call to failure_diagnostic - so the concept works.
To reduce it: How can I access a member function of global fixture on a compilation unit layout shown above. even the use of
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE( my_testsuite, test_observer_fixture )
seems to create/destroy the fixture for each test case.
This one:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_68_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/tests_or...
does it once per test suite. However it is isolated from the test case.
The fact that a test case body can access the fixture is not a very good pattern and has several caveats (although very convenient). For instance, as you can observe, global fixtures and test case/suite fixtures do not have the same isolation.
If you want to access the global fixture, you have to expose your fixture globally, provide some static member function that return a pointer to a singleton. The test framework itself will not create more than one instance.
This concept is shown at the documentation, using a singleton would solve the problem with the access.
But I am a bit lost in what you are doing, and to me this does not go to the right direction. If the test module is very complicated to maintain, it reduces the chances to be useful, steady and stable on the long run.
When I look back, I can see one of the comment in the code that says:
// call diagnostic only in failure case and write then
This means to me that a fixture should be executed for each test case. The purpose of the fixture would be to write the diagnostic in case of a failure.
Yes, this was the intent. I solved the problem using BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE_F where the fixture self has no member/empty constructor. The relevant code will be (delayed) instanciated inside the failure_diagnostic(...) member function. This gives clean design too :) So, thanks for your help and ideas, Olaf
participants (2)
-
Olaf Peter
-
Raffi Enficiaud