CodeWarrior 9 for Mac
Has anyone used boost on CodeWarrior 9 for Mac? Our Mac programmer tried compiling boost v1.30.0 on CodeWarrior v9.3 running on MacOS 10.3. She got a slew of compile errors, (beginning with a check() macro). Is there any point in proceeding? Thanks, -- Stephen W. Carson dirXion St. Louis, MO
--- At Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:49:09 -0600, Stephen W. Carson wrote:
Has anyone used boost on CodeWarrior 9 for Mac? Our Mac programmer tried compiling boost v1.30.0 on CodeWarrior v9.3 running on MacOS 10.3. She got a slew of compile errors, (beginning with a check() macro). Is there any point in proceeding?
I am using various parts of boost on CW 8.3 on both 9 and X. I don't use all of boost (does anyone?) but the parts I use do work. I only "compile" two libraries, regex and test. Everything else I use is headers. Basically CodeWarrior just works. The usual process is to drag the sources to the library you want into a project and compile. Of course headers just get included and just work. There are problems if you try and use #pragma once. Boost relies on many many reentrant include files. We generally relied on pragma once as a more modern equivalent to guard definitions. We modify a number of boost headers to disable our enabling of pragma once. ...Duane
At Monday 2004-12-20 16:49, you wrote:
Has anyone used boost on CodeWarrior 9 for Mac? Our Mac programmer tried compiling boost v1.30.0 on CodeWarrior v9.3 running on MacOS 10.3. She got a slew of compile errors, (beginning with a check() macro). Is there any point in proceeding?
given that v1.32.0 exists I'd say switch there first
Thanks, -- Stephen W. Carson dirXion St. Louis, MO _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
participants (3)
-
Duane Murphy
-
Stephen W. Carson
-
Victor A. Wagner Jr.