Ian, That's excellent, thanks! Is g++ the compiler with the most of the c++0x specification implemented and the best to experiment with the new features? Thanks, Jim On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:00 PM, boost-users-request@lists.boost.org wrote:

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Boost-users digest..." Today's Topics:

1. C++0x resources (Jim Hodapp) 2. Re: C++0x resources (Ian Bruntlett)

From: Jim Hodapp Date: March 27, 2011 10:53:09 AM EDT To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [Boost-users] C++0x resources Reply-To: boost-users@lists.boost.org

Hi all,

I just saw in another post that C++0x FDIS has been voted complete and ready to ship. Is there a good website (or book) that I can start reading to get familiar with the new features? I've seen a few resources here and there on one or two topics, such as "auto", but no good place to read and see example for every new feature. Is the GNU g++ compiler the best implementation to experiment with these new language features?

-Jim

From: Ian Bruntlett Date: March 27, 2011 11:27:42 AM EDT To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] C++0x resources Reply-To: boost-users@lists.boost.org

Hi Jim,

On 27 March 2011 15:53, Jim Hodapp wrote: I just saw in another post that C++0x FDIS has been voted complete and ready to ship. Is there a good website (or book) that I can start reading to get familiar with the new features? I've seen a few resources here and there on one or two topics, such as "auto", but no good place to read and see example for every new feature. Is the GNU g++ compiler the best implementation to experiment with these new language features?

Take a look at Bjarne Stroustrup's C++ 0x FAQ:- http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html

HTH,

Ian

-- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org/

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users