Three-way comparison operator
Hi Boosters, Does anyone know if Boost.Test has been updated to provide support for the three-way comparison operator? I’m asking because I’ve encountered a situation where my user-defined class provides the three-way comparison operator but when I perform comparisons using Boost.Test it complains that my class has no ‘operator==’ which is true because it provides ‘operator<=>’. Please note that I’m using Boost 1.73.0 and g++ 10.0.1. Is there any plan to add the three-way comparison operator support? Kind regards, Leo
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 07:18, Leo Carreon via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi Boosters,
Does anyone know if Boost.Test has been updated to provide support for the three-way comparison operator?
https://www.boost.org/community/policy.html says "A tag on the subject line will help ensure the right people see your post." FYI, busy maintainers may ignore all posts but the tagged ones. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 07:18, Leo Carreon via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Does anyone know if Boost.Test has been updated to provide support for the three-way comparison operator?
Is there any plan to add the three-way comparison operator support?
If there is no answer, you may consider opening an issue at https://github.com/boostorg/test Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Scanning the change log it doesn't seem likely boost.test was updated. Also given that the feature really just arrived in clang 10 in the last month and gcc 10 isn't yet released almost no one has reacted to operator<=> yet. All that said, most stuff like boost.test that uses operators shouldn't need to be modified. A deeper possibility here is boost.test is fine and that Leo might need to implement operator== with the operator<=>. Have a look thru this blog post https://brevzin.github.io/c++/2019/07/28/comparisons-cpp20/ https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_73_0/libs/test/doc/html/boost_test/change_l... Jeff On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:39 AM Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 07:18, Leo Carreon via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Does anyone know if Boost.Test has been updated to provide support for
the three-way comparison operator?
Is there any plan to add the three-way comparison operator support?
If there is no answer, you may consider opening an issue at https://github.com/boostorg/test
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 13:17, Jeff Garland via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Scanning the change log it doesn't seem likely boost.test was updated. Also given that the feature really just arrived in clang 10 in the last month and gcc 10 isn't yet released almost no one has reacted to operator<=> yet. All that said, most stuff like boost.test that uses operators shouldn't need to be modified. A deeper possibility here is boost.test is fine and that Leo might need to implement operator== with the operator<=>. Have a look thru this blog post https://brevzin.github.io/c++/2019/07/28/comparisons-cpp20/
One of the changes of C++20, coming with operator<=>, is rewritten candidates for comparison operator overload resolution, which has been causing massive breakage among any significant C++ codebase. Many people have already been submitting patches for these for the last six months in various software packages, Boost included.
participants (2)
-
Jeff Garland -
Leo Carreon -
Mateusz Loskot -
Mathias Gaunard