1.34.0 release date?
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately? - James Jones Administrative Data Mgmt. Webmaster 375 Raritan Center Pkwy, Suite A Data Architect Edison, NJ 08837
<james.jones@firstinvestors.com> writes:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
I can add msvc-8 and msvc-7_1 (bjam v2) to my set of tests (32bit, not 64bit ones),. I'm also considering running tests on my other 64bit Linux machine (Ubuntu 6.06, dual-core AMD), compilers I have in mind are GCC 3.4.6 and 4.0.3 and maybe 4.1.1 , *if* there is some interest. B.
On Fri, August 11, 2006 17:14, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
I can add msvc-8 and msvc-7_1 (bjam v2) to my set of tests (32bit, not 64bit ones),. I'm also considering running tests on my other 64bit Linux machine (Ubuntu 6.06, dual-core AMD), compilers I have in mind are GCC 3.4.6 and 4.0.3 and maybe 4.1.1 , *if* there is some interest.
B.
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
I could do Windows part for XP Pro x64 for msvc-8, msvc-7_1 and mingw compiler if there is some interest. With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian
At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:
<james.jones@firstinvestors.com> writes:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made?? I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages? IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> writes:
At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:
<james.jones@firstinvestors.com> writes:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made??
No, I don't. These were from Sean Wang's results, and the MSVC installation mistake was immediately apparent from looking at the error messages (now fixed so you can't see it).
I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages?
Don't know what that means.
IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.
Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
At 05:48 2006-08-13, David Abrahams wrote:
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> writes:
At 08:48 2006-08-11, David Abrahams wrote:
<james.jones@firstinvestors.com> writes:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/de veloper/issues.html (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
you wanna be so kind as to EXPLAIN the mistake I made??
No, I don't. These were from Sean Wang's results, and the MSVC installation mistake was immediately apparent from looking at the error messages (now fixed so you can't see it).
Apologies. Given that there are exactly TWO msvc-8.0 testers (I didn't know a new one had shown up) and I couldn't find anything particularly different in my setup for several months it seems reasonable to believe the message was about _my_ testing setup.
I haven't touched that bzip junk in ages?
Don't know what that means.
well, if you looked at some of the red squares under RudbekAssociates msvc-8_0 and drill down iostreams it would be pellucidly clear.
IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.
Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us.
Are you implying that the boost test and regression system is NOT provided by boost? Hmmm.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> writes:
IMO the mistake is in the way the scripts are updated and the fact that you guys NEVER mention that the testers must do somehting to accomodate the fact that you developers seem incapable of creating a "hands off" testing system.
Calm down, Victor. Boost can't be expected to be responsible for making it easier for anyone to correctly install development tools not provided by us.
Are you implying that the boost test and regression system is NOT provided by boost? Hmmm.
No, I'm implying we don't supply Visual C++, which is what is improperly installed on that system. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Does that mean 1_34_0 passs all the tests on msvc-8, or just that the report is inacurate for msvc-8? Thanks, -Zach On 8/11/06, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
<james.jones@firstinvestors.com> writes:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
Nope. We're working on clearing away the regressions. You can watch the progress here:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/developer/is... (regressions are red squares). Note however that the msvc-8 failures are because of an installation mistake on the tester's part.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:00:52 -0400, <james.jones@firstinvestors.com> wrote:
Does anyone know when 1.34.0 is going to be released? Even approximately?
People working with financial data are usually good at seeing trends. Start your Mozilla Firefox, go to <http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/08/subject.php> and open all the mails with subject "[boost] Boost regression notification (2006-08-XX [RC_1_34_0])", each in a different tab. Then hold CTRL+TAB. That might give an idea. -- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer. Library designer ] [ For hire http://gennaro-prota.50webs.com/]
participants (3)
-
Bronek Kozicki -
David Abrahams -
Gennaro Prota -
james.jones＠firstinvestors.com -
Ovanes Markarian -
Victor A. Wagner Jr. -
Zachary Drummond