Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1_58_0_rc1 is available for testing - coroutine2 missing
2015-03-12 13:57 GMT+01:00 Daniel James
On 12 March 2015 at 09:42, Oliver Kowalke
wrote: boost.coroutine2 is missing in the archive
It's not in the master branch of the super-project.
my patches were merged to branch develop - will it be merged to master? https://github.com/boostorg/boost/pull/52 https://github.com/boostorg/boost/pull/60 https://github.com/boostorg/boost/pull/61 https://github.com/boostorg/boost/pull/63
On 12 March 2015 at 14:00, Oliver Kowalke
2015-03-12 13:57 GMT+01:00 Daniel James
: On 12 March 2015 at 09:42, Oliver Kowalke
wrote: boost.coroutine2 is missing in the archive
It's not in the master branch of the super-project.
my patches were merged to branch develop - will it be merged to master?
No, it's too late now. Libraries aren't automatically added to the release, you need to get a release manager to check it first.
2015-03-12 15:21 GMT+01:00 Daniel James
No, it's too late now. Libraries aren't automatically added to the release, you need to get a release manager to check it first.
that is astonishing because I asked several times to add the library on the mailing list sometimes I got no answer - only one time I was told to push the pull requests as mentioned above
On 12 March 2015 at 14:49, Oliver Kowalke
2015-03-12 15:21 GMT+01:00 Daniel James
: No, it's too late now. Libraries aren't automatically added to the release, you need to get a release manager to check it first.
that is astonishing because I asked several times to add the library on the mailing list sometimes I got no answer - only one time I was told to push the pull requests as mentioned above
When you asked me to setup a git module for you I did that. Then you posted this mail: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/02/219859.php Given the subject line, I'm not surprised no one noticed it. Then you posted this: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/02/219941.php I'm not sure why you expected it to be included in the release given that it wasn't even in testing at that point. You've done this before, surely you understand that you have to get the tests working first?
2015-03-12 16:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel James
I'm not sure why you expected it to be included in the release given that it wasn't even in testing at that point. You've done this before, surely you understand that you have to get the tests working first?
the unit/regression tests (branch develop) are already executed for some weeks. I assumed that the merge from develop to master will be 'automatically' done by the release managers. I find it not easy to get the information what are the correct steps. so, I ask you to merge the develop into master at least for the tests.
participants (2)
-
Daniel James
-
Oliver Kowalke