RE: [Boost-Users] HP, aCC and the standards
I would recommend contacting the aCC support people. They are generally quite reasonable. In fact, the hp status tables (which appear a bit out of date) at http://www.boost.org/status/cs-hpux.html are run remotely on a box provided by HP for boost to use. At the point when this was set up, I was investigating whether we should use aCC or g++. I went through and developed a few simple test cases to demonstrate the bugs in a few of the tests. They accepted them, but gave no time line. I think development of aCC was initially really hurt when Daveed Vandevoorde went to EDG, and I'd guess all the linux/compaq hubbub probably hasn't helped to much. I think A.03.33 was released over a year ago.
-----Original Message----- From: dlux42
[mailto:dlux@spam.sch.bme.hu] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 7:53 AM To: Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Boost-Users] HP, aCC and the standards Hello Guys!
I am now fighting with HP to recognize that their compiler is buggy. I am one of their customer and would like to get help with this fight.
I want to use the boost.org format and regex libraries on HP-UX 11.00 with aCC, and I got contacted the local HP office about that.
I told that I want to use modern libraries like the "boost.org" library. They answered that the HP aCC is the implementation of the ISO/IEC 14882 standard of the C++ language.
They provided two links about the compiler:
http://www.software.hp.com/DTDC_products_list.html (follow the aC++ link). http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/2213/libs.htm#slIntro (introductionary concepts).
Do you have any evidence that the HP implementation of C++ language breaks the standard and that's why the regex library and format library does not compile on those platform? (if you need sample error message, then I can send it to the list).
I am using stlport 4.5-119, aCC A.03.33.
Please Cc: the replies to my private email-address also.
Thanks for your help in advance,
dLux
Info: http://www.boost.org Wiki: http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl Unsubscribe: mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Monday 03 February 2003 18:06, Tom Matelich wrote:
I would recommend contacting the aCC support people. They are generally quite reasonable. In fact, the hp status tables (which appear a bit out of date) at http://www.boost.org/status/cs-hpux.html are run remotely on a box provided by HP for boost to use.
For an updated status-page, check out : http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/ and you see that aCC has the highest failure rate ! I also recently talked to an HP representative and he was under the impression that aCC was very confirming.
participants (2)
-
Tom Matelich
-
Toon Knapen