RE: [Boost-users] Re: MPL Question on crossing the compile \ runtimebarrier with bind | adding to boost profiler abstracted file access

31 Mar
2005
31 Mar
'05
1:38 a.m.
[Dave Abrahams Writes:]
[Brian Braatz Writes:]
As always THANK YOU Dave
What about the boost\Lambda.bind vs MPL bind?. Is there a way to write
the
Tyepdef MyClass

31 Mar
31 Mar
5:22 a.m.
New subject: MPL Question on crossing the compile \ runtimebarrier with bind | adding to boost profiler abstracted file access
"Brian Braatz"
I don't know what you're asking.
I don't know what "MPL driven" means, but...
or is the "typeof" the only option
Yes, it's the only option if you want to get the type of bind(...) into that template argument list. You need to pass it through typeof, since bind(...) is always a runtime expression.
MPL composes (compile-time) metafunctions Boost.Lambda composes (runtime) functions
(do you parenthesize everything?) (just wondering.) (it's all about s-expressions)-ly y'rs, Dave -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
7289
Age (days ago)
7289
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Brian Braatz
-
David Abrahams