[GIL] Boost gil and constexpr
Hi, It seems that the development on boost::gil is starting again on boost 1.68, and I have an advise: I think boost::gil would strongly benefits on using constexpr in the code, it would make a lot of things statically resolved. There's a huge work to put this everywhere, but I think it would be nice. Just an idea. Thanks,
Hi Eloi, you're correct and so many other features like variadric templates, for instance. Regards, Christian On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:09 PM Eloi Du Bois via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the development on boost::gil is starting again on boost 1.68, and I have an advise: I think boost::gil would strongly benefits on using constexpr in the code, it would make a lot of things statically resolved. There's a huge work to put this everywhere, but I think it would be nice. Just an idea.
Thanks, _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
On 16 July 2018 at 20:50, Eloi Du Bois via Boost-users
Hi,
It seems that the development on boost::gil is starting again on boost 1.68, and I have an advise: I think boost::gil would strongly benefits on using constexpr in the code, it would make a lot of things statically resolved. There's a huge work to put this everywhere, but I think it would be nice. Just an idea.
Christian has already confirmed those C++ features are/will be considered. We have already started modernization of GIL code and the more we look into it the list of tasks is getting longer. Pull requests are welcome! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
That is good news, I would really like but cannot do some opensource right now. Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 04:23, Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> a écrit :
On 16 July 2018 at 20:50, Eloi Du Bois via Boost-users
wrote: Hi,
It seems that the development on boost::gil is starting again on boost 1.68, and I have an advise: I think boost::gil would strongly benefits on using constexpr in the code, it would make a lot of things statically resolved. There's a huge work to put this everywhere, but I think it would be nice. Just an idea.
Christian has already confirmed those C++ features are/will be considered. We have already started modernization of GIL code and the more we look into it the list of tasks is getting longer.
Pull requests are welcome!
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (3)
-
Christian Henning
-
Eloi Du Bois
-
Mateusz Loskot