-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:stlsoft@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:27 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [Boost-users] Re: boost::shared_ptr performance

...

...

[I posted this in boost.devel, but got no response. Presumably that was the wrong group. :)]

I'm going to respond, but I don't have much to say. I would think that with all the work you put into making this comparison that you could probably determine why smart_ptr is slower than yours. To me this comparison is interesting but not without comparing your code with smart_ptr. Given the lack of code, I have to assume you're waiting for someone to say something like, "WOW!!! I gotta get me some of that!"

No, I was seeking information, as I said.

"There are environment settings for which boost::shared_ptr will perform much better. If that's so, can someone help me out with suggestions of what defines to make?"

It turns out that there are.

If I was wanting to make a splash, I'd got for a dip down at the beach.

:) Sorry for any appearance of hostility. I'll check out the devel thread. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. -----------------------------------------------------------------------