I'm using the following for a couple of monthes. Seems to work. ////////////////////////////////////////// struct edge_less_than : public std::binary_function { bool operator()(const edge_descriptor_t& __x, const edge_descriptor_t& __y) const { //return __x.second.get_property() < __y.second.get_property(); //return &__x < &__y; return __x.get_property() < __y.get_property(); } }; You can do something better depending of what you need. Possible this will help http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2004/08/7579.php Regards, --dima Thomas Costa wrote:

write your own total ordering/comparison function object for Edge objects and declare the map type using this function.

On Apr 20, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote:

Hi, Thank you all for responding to my post. Now I have my own operator function object for the comparison as you advised: struct cmp_edge : public std::binary_function { bool operator()(const Edge &e1, const Edge &e2) const { return e1.get_property() < e2.get_property(); } }; Now I can use std::map. Thanks & best, Irek Jeremy Siek wrote:

Yes, I also recommend the function object approach. You won't have to worry about which namespace the function object is in... this avoids the argument dependent lookup issues that caused problems for the global operator<.

Cheers, Jeremy

On Apr 20, 2006, at 10:26 PM, Thomas Costa wrote:

...

write your own total ordering/comparison function object for Edge objects and declare the map type using this function.

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users