Hello, First off, I apologize if this is a redundant post, I'm relatively new to Boost and I couldn't find a link to a list archive and a google search didn't merit anything either. I'm using the preprocessor lib to generate a class definition from a sequence of sequences. I want to be able to make the last element of each sequence optional and generate additional code based on if the last parameter exists. I'm currently testing for the length of the sequence in a BOOST_PP_IF statement to see if it has the optional last parameter. The problem is that both the true and false result expressions are being expanded and then the correct one is selected based on the evaluation; which in my case causes an error. I boiled down my problem to a fairly simple example: //= test.cpp ================================================= #include <boost/preprocessor/seq/for_each.hpp> #include <boost/preprocessor/control/if.hpp> #include <boost/preprocessor/comparison/equal.hpp> #include <boost/preprocessor/seq/size.hpp> #include <boost/preprocessor/seq/elem.hpp> #include <boost/preprocessor/facilities/empty.hpp> #define MY_SEQ ((var1) (VAR1) (option1)) ((var2) (VAR2)) #define GET_OPTIONAL_ELEMENT(r, data, elem) \ BOOST_PP_IF( \ BOOST_PP_EQUAL(BOOST_PP_SEQ_SIZE(elem), 3), \ BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(2, elem), \ BOOST_PP_EMPTY() \ ) #define DEMO_PROBLEM(seq) \ BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH(GET_OPTIONAL_ELEMENT, _, seq) DEMO_PROBLEM(MY_SEQ) //= test.cpp ================================================= running the above code through gcc -E generates this error: test.cpp:20:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given The root of my problem seems to stem from the fact that BOOST_PP_IF expands both the true and false expressions before it does the if test and just outputs the already expanded expression. Is this correct; and if so, is there a way around it? Or are there any obvious other solutions to my problem that the boost experts can suggest :) Thanks Josh Brown