Serialization issues with 1.34.0 and 1.34.1
I tried to raise a bug with trac, but my request was rejected as possible
spam. I am currently using the 1.32.0 boost library, but would like to get
away from it. One of the main features I am using is boost::serialization.
There are some problems with serialization in 1.32.0, in particular that
shared_ptr needs to have the "serialization" header included before the
real header. The mechanim for handling serialization of shared_ptr is also
a problem. Bitset support is also missing.
I was hoping to pick up 1.34.0, and have since also made an attempt to use
1.34.1. However, both of these revision appear to have regressions against
the 1.32.0 versions. Here is the first bug report I attempted to submit
== bug 1: boost/serialization/optional doesn't include necessary headers
==
The following function refers to version<T>::value without an include of
boost/serialization/version.hpp, resulting in user code that won't
compile. It is possible to work around this problem by including
boost/serialization/version.hpp before including
boost/serialization/optional.hpp. I did not require a work-around with
boost 1.32.0, but both 1.34.0 and 1.34.1 appear to need the work-around.
{{{
template
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
I tried to raise a bug with trac, but my request was rejected as possible spam.
I did another spam settings adjustment... Could you try posting those bugs with trac again? Thanks. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
I tried to raise a bug with trac, but my request was rejected as
Rene, boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org wrote on 03/08/2007 12:32:17 AM: possible
spam. I did another spam settings adjustment... Could you try posting those bugs with trac again?
I just tried my first submission again (2007-08-03T09:06:00+10:00), and had the same problem: Internal Error Submission rejected as potential spam Benjamin.
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
Rene,
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
I tried to raise a bug with trac, but my request was rejected as
boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org wrote on 03/08/2007 12:32:17 AM: possible
spam. I did another spam settings adjustment... Could you try posting those bugs with trac again?
I just tried my first submission again (2007-08-03T09:06:00+10:00), and had the same problem: Internal Error Submission rejected as potential spam
:-( OK I set the spam threshold back to the default. Here's hoping that works. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org wrote on 04/08/2007 01:44:44 AM:
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au wrote:
I tried to raise a bug with trac, but my request was rejected as
Rene, boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org wrote on 03/08/2007 12:32:17 AM: possible
spam. ... :-( OK I set the spam threshold back to the default. Here's hoping that works.
Raised: 1142 and 1143. Thanks :) Benjamin
participants (2)
-
ben.carlyle@wrsa.com.au
-
Rene Rivera