Using boost unit test with QtCreator - Boost-users - lists.stage.boost.cppalliance.org

newer
boost.log compilation

Using boost unit test with QtCreator

older
[Containers] Marshalling deques

Wilhelm

24 Aug 2011 24 Aug '11

10:33 a.m.

Hi all, if one uses the boost unit test macros (see below), qtcreator marks the BOOST_CHECK(...) macros as syntax error (expected ;): #include #include "person.h" BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(Person1) { Person p("Hugo", "Tester"); BOOST_CHECK(p.firstname() == "Hugo"); BOOST_CHECK(p.lastname() == "Tester"); } Does anybody know how to avoid this (yes, I can use the Qt unit testing framework, but thats not a solution in this special case)? -- Wilhelm

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Ovanes Markarian

24 Aug 24 Aug

11:18 a.m.

Hi! On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wilhelm wrote:

[...]

Does anybody know how to avoid this (yes, I can use the Qt unit testing framework, but thats not a solution in this special case)?

IMO Boost Test Framework is fully C++ compliant and compiles well by various compilers. If there are problems with Qt Creator, report a bug to Qt. With Kind Regards, Ovanes

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Wilhelm

11:54 a.m.

Am 24.08.2011 13:18, schrieb Ovanes Markarian:

Hi!

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wilhelm mailto:wilhelm.meier@fh-kl.de> wrote:

[...]

Does anybody know how to avoid this (yes, I can use the Qt unit testing framework, but thats not a solution in this special case)?

IMO Boost Test Framework is fully C++ compliant and compiles well by various compilers. If there are problems with Qt Creator, report a bug to Qt.

Yes, it compiles well! But the syntax-parser of qtcreator reports an error (red wave-underline of BOOST_CHECK macro)

With Kind Regards, Ovanes

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- Wilhelm

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Ovanes Markarian

12:02 p.m.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Wilhelm wrote:

Am 24.08.2011 13:18, schrieb Ovanes Markarian:

...
Hi!

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Wilhelm mailto:wilhelm.meier@fh-kl.de> wrote:

[...]

Does anybody know how to avoid this (yes, I can use the Qt unit testing framework, but thats not a solution in this special case)?

IMO Boost Test Framework is fully C++ compliant and compiles well by various compilers. If there are problems with Qt Creator, report a bug to Qt.

Yes, it compiles well!

But the syntax-parser of qtcreator reports an error (red wave-underline of BOOST_CHECK macro)

I understood your point before, and that is why I wrote you to file a bug to QtCreator. With Kind Regards, Ovanes

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

legalize+jeeves＠mail.xmission.com

26 Aug 26 Aug

6:29 p.m.

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup] boost-users@lists.boost.org spake the secret code <4E54E66C.4000002@fh-kl.de> thusly:

But the syntax-parser of qtcreator reports an error (red wave-underline of BOOST_CHECK macro)

Then report a bug against qtcreator. This is not a problem with Boost.Test. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/ Legalize Adulthood! http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4932

Age (days ago)

4934

Last active (days ago)

Download

4 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

legalize+jeeves＠mail.xmission.com
Ovanes Markarian
Wilhelm