22 Jan
2015
22 Jan
'15
6:17 p.m.
2015-01-22 19:05 GMT+01:00 Robert Ramey
Niall Douglas wrote
On 22 Jan 2015 at 15:20, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
Hello, is it permitted to transform an existing boost library into a C++11-only library?
If you meant here "transform an existing boost library into a C++11-only *Boost* library with C++ 11 only APIs" then I think you need to cycle the library name. Precedent here is that Signals went to Signals2, here I should think Coroutine ought to become Coroutine2.
So in this case, I would prefer the creation of Library2 as in the first case above. Certainly this worked well with signals and other libraries should follow that model.
OK - thx for your suggestions. Who do I have to ask for an additional coroutine2 sub-module? Oliver