13 Feb
2015
13 Feb
'15
5:03 p.m.
I believe however that some people were interested in doing a new C++11 version of MPL. I think the problem is that every year or so someone finds a new fancy way to do meta-programming with the latest C++ features, with noble goals of unifying MPL and Fusion, so most of these rewrites end up as experiments rather than stable libraries.
I think Eric Niebler's meta library is good start for a modern MPL library, and it doesn't try to unify MPL and Fusion. Paul -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/mpl-multiset-tp4672187p4672238.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.