Re: [boost] [TypeSort] Automatic type sorting

Louis Dionne wrote:

Eric Niebler writes: ...

...

FWIW, these indices don't seem all that useful to me. What exactly was the desired behavior?

No idea :-)

The desired behavior was for indexing the sorted tuple to work like indexing the original tuple. That is, given tuple, you were supposed to produce another tuple for which get<0> still returns char[4], even though the first element is physically char[1].