18 Feb
2018
18 Feb
'18
8:44 p.m.
On 2/18/18 2:12 AM, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost
wrote: What does "drop support" mean?
a) libraries should fail to compile with C++03? Any library which does so should be considered "broken" in some sense?
b) libraries should/must be implemented in C++11(+?)? Any library which isn't should/would be considered "broken"
c) libraries should/must be compilable with C++11(+?)? Any libraries which don't would be considered broken.
None of the above, but you already knew that, didn't you?
No. It's a serious question. The phrase "drop support" is confusing to me in the context of Boost. Robert Ramey.