j
k
j a
j l
On 26 August 2017 at 16:39, Oliver Kowalke via Boost wrote:
+1, if 1.65.1 gets boost_1_65_0.patch merged
If I wasn't clear, boost_1_65_0.patch is basically what I'm proposing for 1.65.1. I want to be very stingy about changes.
Back to the thread
Back to the list