5 Sep
2015
5 Sep
'15
2:36 p.m.
2015-09-05 16:28 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller
Thanks, that's what I was hoping for. I was just a little confused about Oliver's previous explanation. Furthermore I think it's correct to state that fibers always run concurrently (please note the subtile difference between parallelism and concurrency).
sorry - I just tried to show that fibers might behave different than threads (e.g. fiber which get signaled via a condition-variable do not immediately run -> deferred to the next cooperative supension) anyway the code is fixed accordingly