2 Aug
2013
2 Aug
'13
10:49 a.m.
2013/8/2 Andrey Semashev
On Friday 02 August 2013 12:52:56 Antony Polukhin wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know Beman is almost always busy, so may I apply trivial fix described in this ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8956 ?
This fix is essential for running regression tests with Intel compiler.
I recently made a workaround in Boost.Test for this problem [1] but I simply dropped noncopyable and replaced it with deleted functions. I wonder if there's any need for noncopyable now besides backward compatibility.
Adding `boost::noncopyable` is much shorter than adding 2-3 lines of macros. Ugly macros are not in users code, so the resulting code is easier to read. Just some syntactic sugar for developers. -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin