23 Jan
2014
23 Jan
'14
5:04 p.m.
On 23 Jan 2014 at 17:31, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
One point of mine not mentioned in the report is that I would really like to see Boost Fibers graphed against Windows Fibers on that performance scaling graph.
it would be more correct to compare boost.context's fcontext with Windows Fibers than boost.fiber AFAIK Windows Fibers do not have a scheduler - ifyou want WinFibers scheduled you would have to write your own (as boost.fiber does)
I would like to see Boost Fibers, fcontext and Windows Fibers. Then one can see if Boost Fibers introduces any unusual "kinks" in the scaling. Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/