It's occurred to me before that boost.serialization could really use a json
archive.
On 25 January 2017 at 02:54, Robert Ramey
On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, Adlai Shawareb wrote:
Hi,
We want to generate an Serialized XML archive now, and be able to deserialize it and get the same data it in the future.
Is Boost XML Serialization guaranteed to be compatible across versions of the library?
It is certainly meant to be. But it is not explicity tested so it can't be guaranteed. If someone wanted to make tests for this, we would look into incorporating them into the test suite.
The XML serialized archive would be stored in a memory chip and, in the future, read back and deserialized. I don't believe that would impact the answer, but want to offer that.
Hmmmm. Remember that the XML generated by the serialization library includes special tags to support the recover of the original C++ data structure which produced the archive. So it's not particularly well suited to "external" applications and, as far as I know, used to recover the data by a C++ program. So if one is going to do this, I don't see much point in using xml. One could get the same portability while using plain text with a lot less overhead.
Robert Ramey
Adlai
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost