Nevin Liber wrote
Is there a reasonable assurance that he'll get it,
Well I got some - safe numerics review - and I found it extremely useful.
or is it just adding latency to the process?
lol - how does posting a review in advvance add latency to the process? It doesn't change the review date.
Of the twenty-two libraries listed, there are a whopping three reviews, two of which are a review of your own library, and one of those is by you where you recommend that we don't accept it into Boost. Not exactly good odds...
My recollection is a whopping 2 reviews. One was just a test of the system. Of course this is not an argument that posting an advance review is a bad idea. What harm can come from it?
The incubator is an experiment. It may succeed, or it may fail. If someone wishes to tie their review to it, that's fine. If they don't wish to, that is fine too.
of course
We know that you want the incubator to succeed, but it is unfair to expect anyone to hold up a review of their library because of it.
Perhaps some future review wizard might want to do such a thing, but so far certainly no one has suggested doing this it for this or any other library in the queue. Robert Ramey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/metaparse-Review-Manager-tp4673218p467350... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.