2017-05-26 8:34 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller via Boost
On 05/26/2017 12:43 AM, charleyb123 . via Boost wrote:
*- Thomas Heller -- (almost a review), ?reject, "not-ready-yet?"
Please don't count my comments as a review. I don't feel qualified right now to make any statements on the quality of the library presented. There is too much in flux of it right now and after all discussions, it is not clear to me what the current state of the library really is and how much it will change after the review.
You are making a valid point. Typically, the outcome of a boost review is etiher "accept" or "acceppt, but fix this and that", or "reject". Now, during this review, my feeling is we are just trying to design big parts of the library. There is so many open questions, that one cannot get te sense of the final shape. To reject it would be sending the wrong message that we do not wat the problem to be solved, or that the solution is wrong. But it is not wrong: it is just "I can make it whatever you want". To accept it on condition that it has a different interface, is like accepting something else than what we see. We can do it technically, but it feels wrong. I am confused here, I admit. Regards, &rzej;