Currently the master branch has a few problems. Here is one typical example.
My project uses the current master to provide boost libraries which I'm not
working on. One file has the statement
#include
which fails to compile since boost/utility/enable_if.hpp has been moved to
core.
This raises a few questions.
a) Isn't the master branch always supposed to be working?
b) There are a lot of intermediate checkins which break the master. Should
these be done an a branch and, once
they are believed to be all correct, merged in as a group. This would
support the concept a) above.
c) will I have to change code in the library I maintain to manually change
all occurrences of
#include
to
#include
?
d) Why are the tests on the master branch passing?
Robert Ramey
--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/big-problem-with-dependency-changes-tp466...
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.