4 Aug
2013
4 Aug
'13
8:22 a.m.
On 08/03/2013 11:03 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Mon Jul 29 2013, Stephen Kelly
wrote: My preference is increasing the compiler requirement, because that may open up more similar opportunities for reducing dependencies and interdependencies throughout boost.
Grepping indicates that that means increasing the compiler requirements to something like __DMC__ > 0x840, I'd be shocked if any version of that compiler worked with any substantial fraction of the Boost codebase.
Ok, then the patch I posted which was specific to that compiler should be fine.
GCC > 3.2, BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION > 500, VC++ > 7.0. +1
What do you think about increasing the compiler requirement much more, as I wrote in another mail? Thanks, Steve.