Re: [boost] [Async] Naming land grab?

Niall Douglas wrote:

I have received a non-public review which raises concerns about the naming land grab by proposed Boost.Async i.e. a Boost library called "Async" claims too much through its name.

Seeing as nobody here has raised this concern to date, can I confirm everybody here is fine with proposed Boost.Async being called Boost.Async?

If you are not, please suggest a preferred alternative name.

Niall

Boost.Asio.Async, or similar. I'd make a similar argument for other libraries that are highly dependent on ASIO. Regards, Phil.