On 7/13/2014 9:12 PM, Nathan Ridge wrote:
Thanks for the link. I'll certainly have a look... Uhm, it's in Nov. and for C++ standard committee. So, it's in far perspective... and the industry I am in is always a few years behind the Standard. :-( Would not that be possible/sensible to address that in Boost for the time being?
Last I spoke to Eric, he had no plans to propose his library (which, by the way, can be found here [1]) to Boost, but that doesn't mean someone else who's willing to do the work couldn't.
Right. I'm not opposed to getting it into Boost. It's just that C++17 is closer than you might think, and my #1 priority to getting ranges into the standard.
I'm curious what Neil thinks of this library as a possible future direction for Boost.Range.
Me too.
-- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org