Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http

On 13-Aug-15 2:09 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:

On August 12, 2015 11:27:09 AM EDT, Niall Douglas wrote:

...

On 12 Aug 2015 at 9:49, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:

...

...

The very first sentence makes it very clear it is not a Boost blessed document.

I'm happy with the newly added note claiming that those are your opinions and yours only. That way others won't feel the need to clarify that's not a Boost thing every single time you mention it.

I think everyone is reasonably happy on this point. Let's call a moratorium on it.

Can we first drop the link to that document from http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Guidelines though, or at least move it below other pre-existing recommendations, including such important ones as naming? - Volodya