Re: [boost] [range] Proposal: addition of front(), back(), at(), operator[]

Hi, Krzysztof Czainski wrote:

2014-03-23 20:59 GMT+01:00 Adam Wulkiewicz :

...

be intuitive. So the following should also be provided:

4. sub(), subscript(), el(), element(), at_index(), at_(), index(), indexed(), access(), operator[], ...? +1 for subscript(rng,n). -1; for operator[], I'd definitely prefer a named function call. The name 'at' would be a perfect name, if it only didn't have the throwing behavior in the Standard Library.

I'd add on(rng, i) in(rng, i) the last might also be related to the word 'index'. Regards, Adam