14 Jul
2015
14 Jul
'15
10:37 a.m.
On 07/11/2015 11:50 PM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
The design rationale and the FAQ seems to be in disagreement about ABI portability.
Did not get that. At what place do they disagree? ABI != portability.
On what side of that equation does "ABI portability" fit? This may be the source of the confusion. As I currently read the documentation, the design rationale leaves the impression that there is no ABI portability, whereas the FAQ that there is some (e.g. for aliases.)