Re: [boost] Boost.Align review begins today

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 23:15:02 -0700, Ahmed Charles wrote:

----------------------------------------

...

To: boost@lists.boost.org From: mostafa_working_away@yahoo.com Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:46:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Align review begins today

On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:48:02 -0700, Ahmed Charles wrote:

(Ahmed, a piece of advice, the review period doesn't end until the end of the review date for all time zones.)

Sorry for believing it was GMT/UTC based.

...

...

Please always state in your review whether you think the library should beaccepted as a Boost library.

No. The author has unfortunately not responded to a majority of questions and concerns I had brought up.

Thanks for your review. I can send out an update with any additional conditions we can agree on, since the result is still conditional acceptance even with your vote, if you would like. Unfortunately, your initial review didn't clearly state a vote, so it wasn't included in the initial summary.

...

(Note: this is solely about a lack of response, and not any disagreements on the direction of library which I may have with the author.)

I believe the spirit of the review process is to mostly review the code and not the author.

My intention was to simply state the fact that without sufficient answers to requested information my vote would have to default to a "no".