On 12.01.2017 17:01, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 12 January 2017 at 20:39, Oliver Kowalke
wrote: why not close boost trac for new bug entries while keeping the history and give the users the hint to enter the bug report in github instead
Some Boost libraries have Github issues disabled. That suggests the author prefers to get issues through Trac.
The question of migrating issue tracking never came up formally. So perhaps some maintainers simply took for granted that migrating wasn't an option ? I think it's at least worth raising the question. (Specifically to the library authors / maintainers. There is no sense in starting another of those endless tools discussions. Something as simple as a quick poll: "would you consider switching to the github tracker, or do you prefer to stay with trac ? Only answer with 'yes' or 'no'... ". :-) )
In practice however, as a bug reporter, I've found that Github works better to iterate quickly on problems and get them fixed.
...in articular as it's integrated with PR reviews. Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...