22 May
2017
22 May
'17
5:32 p.m.
El 22/05/2017 a las 13:43, Peter Dimov via Boost escribió:
Would anyone be so kind as to formally endorse mp11 as a candidate for Boost?
I endorse mp11. In my view, mp11 serves as a low entry barrier replacement for Boost.MPL taking advantage of C++11 and without the conceptual complexities of Boost.Hana (which BTW requires C++14). Boost.Hana is a terrific library, but there's definitely a place for mp11 for those of us metaprogramming the old MPL-way. When I really want extra power and expressivity, I'll go for Hana. Joaquín M López Muñoz