On 4/16/19 11:55 AM, Emil Dotchevski via Boost wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:36 AM Robert Ramey via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
It happens when the expert is so uncertain in the most critical design choices Right - when concensus on design choices cannot be reached.
Consensus is important only insofar as it is believed to lead to correct design, but sometimes correctness and consensus differ. Correctness is what matters.
Hmmm - the problem is that there often multiple "correct" designs. That is, none can be proved to be "incorrect" in every context. The notion of "correctness" is context sensitive. One person might define having an empty state as "incorrect" while another might have another definition. The problem here isn't making a "correct" design, it's agreeing on what is "correct" Robert Ramey
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost