Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost

On 24.10.18 10:32, Mateusz Loskot via Boost wrote:

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 00:41, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:

...

I would make an effort to end the life of some libraries, rather than ending the life of boost or their maintainers. Boost should accept it successes and its failures.

- Is boost.test a success? I think it is, I am biased though. I would love to drop support for C++03 to get rid of all the intra-library dependencies that are polluting the usability.

- Is uBlas a success? If we get things done to accelerate, certainly. Otherwise I will just use Eigen as before.

- Is GIL a success? [...]

Please, present a definition of success or failure as basis to qualify a library for removal from Boost.

That is exactly what I will *not* do, this is you to define the success of the library you maintain :) You know your users and the ecosystem around the library better than anyone else.

FYI, GIL has been abandoned, but thanks to Stefan Seefeld, who joined long lonely wolf of GIL, Christian Henning, it's maintenance has been reactivated.

And I really congratulate you guys for what you achieved!

<...>

If, however, GIL is kicked out from Boost, it will not be the end of the world, neither for GIL nor for me personally as GIL user and maintainer. It would bring many challenges but also opportunities.

I never meant to put the finger on GIL as something to drop, quite the opposite in fact in the light of the recent developments. The point is: we should look at boost with fair criticism over the time and the success of the individual libraries. This success may be within boost, in the community created around that library, or anything else. Some parts are being abandoned, they are simply not needed anymore, they have their equivalent or better alternatives. Raffi