Hi Andrey, The commit rate has nothing to do with code quality or C++ use. And I
wasn't talking about code quality at all.
Surely not, but it can't be all "crap" as Paul M. likes to put it. KISS seems a good approach, if you manage the code-base Google seems to manage. C (with classes) is nothing to look down on, it just works. There is no "Boost" that could enter into dialog. The guy from Google
you referenced to was paid for doing his job on reporting compiler bugs. I would guess that work took considerable amount of time, too.
Ok, nobody "owns" the (boost) project, which highlights the weakness of the open source/volunteer approach (see posts on un-maintained projects). Couldn't the hard-core boosters form a working group and join forces? Whether this guy got/gets paid for doing so (reporting compiler bugs) is rather irrelevant, my point is that he got M$ to take on board his issues (I don't think M$ cares about whether he gets paid or not, as long it's not them doing the paying). What do YOU see as a way forward in achieving the objective of being able to use Clang/LLVM with boost on Windows? I'm not talking about compiling boost with Clang/LLVM (that's of minor importance I would say), I'm happy compiling with VC, but I would like to be able to use those VC-binaries with Clang/LLVM, i.e. the headers need to be able to deal with the platform/compiler combo. I would like to ask you to respond in terms of solutions rather than arguing points of dis-agreement. degski -- (\___/) (+'.'+) (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination!