10 Oct
2018
10 Oct
'18
4:02 p.m.
On 10/10/18 1:24 AM, Roger Leigh via Boost wrote:
I think it's primarily useful for packaging standalone applications where there are no complex library dependencies. Certainly for Windows and MacOS X it makes sense. For packaging a set of libraries like Boost, I don't think it's as useful;
we already have good Boost packaging anyway, so I'd suggest ignoring it at least for now.
Hmmm - what is "Boost packaging" refering to? Robert Ramey
Regards, Roger
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost