Looking at the history of boost/config/auto_link.hpp, 1.70 didn't autolink under Clang at all
and since 1.71 Clang autolinks to clangw libraries. So I don't see why 1.73 and 1.74 would differ.
Clang or Clang-cl? a freshly build 1.73 and 1.74-rc2 showing exact that behavior both boost versions are only build with vc141 - there are only vc141 libs available if using boost 1.73 it makes no difference in building with microsoft-cl or clang-cl if using boost 1.74 - boost will ask for clangw10 libs Am 12.08.2020 um 16:08 schrieb Peter Dimov via Boost:
Dennis Luehring wrote:
until 1.74 there was no need to prepare a descent build of boost for clang
Looking at the history of boost/config/auto_link.hpp, 1.70 didn't autolink under Clang at all, and since 1.71 Clang autolinks to clangw libraries. So I don't see why 1.73 and 1.74 would differ.
If you want to override this, #define BOOST_LIB_TOOLSET to vc141 (if using 2017.)
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost