Le 30.07.17 à 14:21, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost a écrit :
Le 30.07.17 à 10:51, Peter Dimov via Boost a écrit :
Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
Hi,
For some libraries that are using boost.test, it seems that boost.test is included in the weight. But this is in fact not totally true: as it is shown, it is a "developer" weight that wants to run the tests and compile the doc.
The dependencies in the report are computed based on the headers in `include`. If one of them includes a Boost.Test header, Test is considered a dependency.
The usual practice is to move such private headers to the `test` subdirectory.
That is weird though that eg. boost.graph depends on boost.test. After your reply, it is indeed in
which should then be indeed moved somewhere else.
However, still bimap refers to test as a "secondary dependency". What does that mean? Thanks, Raffi
Would it be somehow possible to account only for the source code that generates the libraries, as seen by users?
This would imply that header-only libraries have no dependencies, which is absurd.
You got me wrong here.
Best, Raffi
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost