7 Oct
2014
7 Oct
'14
6:36 a.m.
Le 06/10/14 18:07, Mathias Gaunard a écrit :
On 06/10/14 01:19, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
On 05/10/2014 07:44 p.m., Mathias Gaunard wrote:
In particular, the problem is that it uses BOOST_CONSTEXPR in contexts where C++11-constexpr is invalid, but where it is valid in C++14.
Should there be a separate BOOST_CONSTEXPR14 macro?
This is the motive for https://github.com/boostorg/config/pull/39
I see. So the solution is BOOST_RELAXED_CONSTEXPR?
What about when constexpr becomes even more relaxed?
BOOST_MORE_RELAXED_CONSTEXPR ;-) Vicente