10 Dec
2013
10 Dec
'13
7:05 p.m.
On 10 December 2013 16:36, Mathias Gaunard
On 10/12/13 16:45, Vladimir Prus wrote:
As I've said on Boost.Build mailing list, such a policy or mechanism shall only be in effect after everybody reviews results of the conversion for real, and is happy with them. The conversion was, to a degree, rushed, so we need a time to fix issues before we declare we're really done with the transition to git and start playing by git rules.
Isn't that period over according to the planning? There was a period for library authors to review the history migrated to git.
No, git was only opened at the end of that period. So no one could have modified their repositories during that period, only rejected the conversion outright.