Re: [boost] Interest in a "concepts lite" library?

On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:

On 4/20/16 1:48 AM, Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente wrote:

...

Hi!

With concepts lite not getting into C++17, the need for library-based alternatives becomes more apparent. With this regard, the current Boost.ConceptCheck library is outdated, as it emulates an too old proposal for concepts, and it does not leverage more modern techniques (e.g. expression sfinae).

I think such an effort is long overdue. The world needs a modern replacement for BCC. As mentioned in other posts, tick would also be a candidate. There might be others. I would like to see them considered/reviewed as a group in order to select the best candidate for boost.

As this is all a volunteer effort, I think I would rather see better collaboration instead of competing.

Robert Ramey

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost